Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05034
Original file (BC 2013 05034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05034
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an 
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without 
characterization of service) be changed to a code that would 
allow him to reenlist.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He believes his RE code to be unjust because he was medically 
discharged after being in Basic Military Training (BMT) for 
little over a week.  It was stated he had anxiety - he believes 
it was nerves and not anxiety.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, he provides a personal 
statement and two character references.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 July 2012.

The applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to 
recommend he be discharged from the Air Force under the 
provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208 (Adjustment Disorder).  
The specific reason was the applicant was diagnosed as having a 
mental disorder.  It was determined this condition interfered 
with duty performance and conduct and was severe enough that his 
ability to function in the military was significantly impaired.  
The specific diagnosis was Axis I – Adjustment Disorder with 
Anxiety.

He was advised of his rights in this matter and waived his right 
to consult with counsel and waived his right to submit a 
statement on his own behalf.  In a legal review of the case 
file, the staff judge advocate found the case legally sufficient 
and recommended discharge.  The discharge authority concurred 
with the recommendation and directed an entry level separation 
with an RE code of 2C.  The applicant was discharged on 20 July 
2012 and was credited with 19 days served on active duty.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AETC/SGPS recommends denial.  SGPS states after two weeks in BMT 
he was seen by Mental Health and given a diagnosis that is not 
compatible with military service.  Based on the documentation on 
file in the applicant’s records, the separation was done in 
accordance with established policy and administrative 
procedures.

The SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  DPSOA states the RE code “2C” is 
required based on the entry level separation with 
uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does not 
provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to 
his RE code.

The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 2 May 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 
30 days (Exhibit E).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office. 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record, we believe that given 
the circumstances surrounding his separation from the Air Force, 
the RE code assigned was proper and in compliance with the 
appropriate instructions.  In addition, the applicant has not 
provided any evidence which would lead us to believe that a 
change in his record to allow him to reenlist is warranted.  In 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.  
Therefore, we agree with the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an 
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, 
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-05034 in Executive Session on 3 June 2014, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 October 2013, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  DD Form 214 and Discharge Package.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 13 November 2013.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 6 December 2013.
   Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 May 2014.


2


3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05836

    Original file (BC-2012-05836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05836 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant also stated his desire to leave the military due to increased anxiety and stress at home. DPSOA states the RE code 2C is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03242

    Original file (BC 2013 03242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this case, the applicant indicated his urinary incontinence was exacerbated by over-hydrating during the day and he should be granted a waiver to continue his service. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant argues that the only time he should have been prevented from participating in his graduation was during the time he was experiencing...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00970

    Original file (BC 2014 00970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00970 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. On 10 Jan 13, his commander recommended he be given an entry level discharge for mental disorders under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02372

    Original file (BC 2013 02372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 September 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). However, the Board agrees with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPSOA that the applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code. Exhibit E....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01600

    Original file (BC-2013-01600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be changed to honorable and his reentry (RE) code 2C (involuntarily separated with honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to 1 to allow him to reenlist. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01758

    Original file (BC-2013-01758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge and his entry level service characterization. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSOA recommends his RE code be changed to “2C,” which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service." The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02501

    Original file (BC-2011-02501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 Jan 11, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for a condition that interferes with military service, specifically for mental disorders. DPSOS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04791

    Original file (BC 2013 04791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04791 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without service characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. On 28 Sep 13, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnished an entry-level separation with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02075

    Original file (BC 2013 02075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 Mar 12, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen for a mental disorder. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his narrative reason for separation. The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05509

    Original file (BC 2013 05509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also disqualified him from retention in the Air Force. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 August 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...